Pano Airfield made in Evolution - What versions of RF Can Import
- Thread starter tomsza
- Start date
technoid
Well-known member
Read the thread below about EVO's new material handling, it should answer your question. Read this quote from that thread.
https://forums.realflight.com/index.php?threads/material-definition-system.61624/
Last edited:
technoid
Well-known member
I'm not sure what I'll do next. But I'll keep it in mind.Technoid could you make a curare 60 like the one on my profile or Benny Kjellgren my grandpa’s mach 1 he used in toc Las Vegas just wondering
Svenne
New member
OK, that makes sense. If I build the pano airfield and save it in RF9.5s, do you know the possibility of that working in RF7.5?
Try importing your airfield into Evo DX9 Deprecated beta, I have tested with many aircraft and helicopters, it seems to work okay, unfortunately I have not tested with an airfield.
The saved RFX exported file from the DX9 Deprecated works in RF7, RF8, RF9, RFE and RF-X.
The saved RFX exported file from the DX9 Deprecated works in RF7, RF8, RF9, RFE and RF-X.
Thanks for the information. Was able to start Evolution in the DX9 Deprecated mode. I still get an error message trying to import the .RFX file. From there I will rebuild the pano airfield in DX9 Deprecated and see if the guy who has RF7.5 can open it.
I made a simple export (Pilot and Plane spawn, and a couple custom 3D static objects) of the airfield using the beta version and the guy with RF7.5 was able to import is and it seems to work.
Now I've developed another issue. In the original version, I took screenshots of the Properties windows of all the assets in my completed original version so I have references for placing all the static objects in the beta version. Everything was going good. I started with the Pilot Spawn and Plane Spawn and worked my way down the list of static objects. Until the objects I was placing started to look out of place. When I referred back to my Pilot Spawn, its Relative Position numbers had changed. And if I readjust my Pilot Spawn back you its original Relative Position numbers, it moves to a different location making all the assets I previously placed wrong (their Relative Position numbers now need to be corrected). Is there an association with the Pilot Spawn that is causing this change?
Now I've developed another issue. In the original version, I took screenshots of the Properties windows of all the assets in my completed original version so I have references for placing all the static objects in the beta version. Everything was going good. I started with the Pilot Spawn and Plane Spawn and worked my way down the list of static objects. Until the objects I was placing started to look out of place. When I referred back to my Pilot Spawn, its Relative Position numbers had changed. And if I readjust my Pilot Spawn back you its original Relative Position numbers, it moves to a different location making all the assets I previously placed wrong (their Relative Position numbers now need to be corrected). Is there an association with the Pilot Spawn that is causing this change?
Good to hear the DX9 beta works with your initial tests for an airport with a basic configuration, and now allows other users with previous versions of RF to import the resulting .rfx file, let us know of any issues that arise as you add more objects to make the the airports more complex.