Screenshots hardly display the difference since AA is done in hardware - after - the frame buffer image has been generated.
When you take a screen shot you are grabbing the frame buffer image WITHOUT AA applied.
But yes no AA and anything above 4x AA is VERY noticeable.
First part of the statement is true, as for the second this is a RealFlight forum and only one example is relevant. If there is a AA setting that is being incorrectly used (or not used) by the program, then that is relevant and KnifeEdge does listen.There is no debate in this topic...if you must press further I can show you countless examples.
Hopefully that gives you a clue at the general level of frustration I feel from people who drag their certifications here. I find it easier to disregard that part. More often than not, it's the right thing to do.Oh my.
As stated in that same post, I can't tell a difference between AA and no AA at the native resolution, anyway. In theory, if you had a screen with an infinite number of pixels, you would have no need for AA at all. So the question becomes, where is the point of diminishing returns?Just saw your edit...you have both FXAA on and normal AA..FXAA will blur the entire screen (including instruments)...it is a "poor mans" AA and not necessary if you have the rig for regular AA.