jeffpn
Well-known member
I concur. KE's content looks to all be true to the 3D model size when it comes to physics. I've seen alot of cheater surfaces on custom content.dhk79 said:any modifications must be reasonable.
Doug
I concur. KE's content looks to all be true to the 3D model size when it comes to physics. I've seen alot of cheater surfaces on custom content.dhk79 said:any modifications must be reasonable.
Doug
dhk79 said:The Switchblade is up on the swaps.
There were a couple of limitations in the physics model.
#1 since I used a geardoor function to control the motion for the wing doors, the nose wheel does not rotate in surface mode (RealFlight thinks it has been retracted).
#2 spinners do not seem to work (i.e. spin) with ducted fan blades.
#3 without having any real performance data and guessing about all the weights anyway, I did not readjust weights or add ballast to remove the CG fudge factor (it just wasn't worth the effort).
There are, however, no adjustments to lift or other performance factors on any of the parts. Nor are there any cheater wing surfaces, so in my opinion, the flying motorcycle concept is feasible.
Doug
I've been on vacation, so haven't checked the forum but you got it.Wingman57 said:Oooh Oooh Oh i think i know, pick me is it one of these. It recently got FAA certification and i saw it at EAA last year.
Maj. Numbskully said:I feel the same way just seeing my CSs in screen shots or MP
that kid did a pretty good job of video taping it ........... lol ......."My arms are getting tired"