jeffpn said:They were designed for G2, and the later ones with G3 in mind. They were never designed for G4. That's why I consider them to be a bonus.
josh0987 said:Come on... the add ons are ten years old! Why should KE even bother with 10 year old software? AND why whine about it?.
Next time, speak for yourself.Law said:What does that have to do with the fact that KnifeEdge said that they were going to make the Add-Ons available to G4 users when they announced the release of G4?
Did you not believe what KE was saying? ... Now I see, you thought KnifeEdge was just lying to you again and they'd never make the Add-ons available, so that makes them a bonus in your minds. You really need to stop thinking of KE that way. They're usually pretty good about following through when they say they're going to do something.
Why do I have to say things a million different ways to you? Since they were never designed for G4, KE was not obligated to redo them for G4. Now of course, once they announced that they will make them work for G4, then they're obligated to make them work. That's just good business sense. I agree with you there. And of course I believed KE when they said they'd make them work. You may have missed that very statement in other posts of mine. So, don't put words in my mouth. I have never known KE to lie, and there is no reason to doubt them on this or any other issue. How exactly do you know in what way I think of KE? You really do tend to twist other users statements alot, and assume things that are not true. And you did it again.Law said:What does that have to do with the fact that KnifeEdge said that they were going to make the Add-Ons available to G4 users when they announced the release of G4?
Did you not believe what KE was saying? ... Now I see, you thought KnifeEdge was just lying to you again and they'd never make the Add-ons available, so that makes them a bonus in your minds. You really need to stop thinking of KE that way. They're usually pretty good about following through when they say they're going to do something.
Yeap, this is possible on vBulletin. just hit the ignore button on the users profileBlade Scraper said:Why can't we all just ignor Law? It's so stupid how things go with him.
Use the report post button also.josh0987 said:Yeap, this is possible on vBulletin. just hit the ignore button on the users profile
If you really have to, I guess.Blade Scraper said:Use the report post button also.
For the report post to be effective, stay within the KE groundrules for that tactic:Blade Scraper said:Use the report post button also.
I don't agree that Law's dissension in his expressed opinions necessarily fall into those groundrules ... at least not for me. I don't have to agree with him, but he DOES have the right to epress his opinion ... and if I disagree with him enough, I can use the other recommended tactic, and simply put him and his message traffic under my blacklist. Me? I sorta like to hear what he has to say, whether or not I agree with him. Just my $0.02."Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising messages, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts.
jeffpn said:Why do I have to say things a million different ways to you? Since they were never designed for G4, KE was not obligated to redo them for G4. Now of course, once they announced that they will make them work for G4, then they're obligated to make them work. That's just good business sense. I agree with you there. And of course I believed KE when they said they'd make them work. You may have missed that very statement in other posts of mine. So, don't put words in my mouth. I have never known KE to lie, and there is no reason to doubt them on this or any other issue. How exactly do you know in what way I think of KE? You really do tend to twist other users statements alot, and assume things that are not true. And you did it again.
Blade Scraper said:Use the report post button also.
KE was NEVER obligated to making add ons compatible.Law said:I agree that the Add-Ons were created for G2 and G3 and that they're old technology. But, KE "obligated" themselves to make them available to G4 user when they released G4 and said; "... We are still looking into some way of making these packs available to RealFlight G4 customers."
If during these past several months they'd indicated any intentions or findings to the contrary then I could agree that they "might" not be forthcoming. But, every indication was that they were "working" on making them available.
So, my point is - How could anyone consider the making of them available as a bonus? It's something that KE has obligated themselves to do for months!
Of course, for those of you who still consider then a "bonus" ... congratulations, your low expectations have been fulfilled.
What my buddy Law was saying is that once KE obligated themselves to make the addons compatible by saying that they would, they were obligated.josh0987 said:KE was NEVER obligated to making add ons compatible.
Jeffpn said:Since they were never designed for G4, KE was not obligated to redo them for G4. Now of course, once they announced that they will make them work for G4, then they're obligated to make them work.
Actually, announcing an intention to try to do something does not obligate one to get it done.Law said:I agree that the Add-Ons were created for G2 and G3 and that they're old technology. But, KE "obligated" themselves to make them available to G4 user when they released G4 and said; "... We are still looking into some way of making these packs available to RealFlight G4 customers."
Well, it's a good thing I have Law around to provide that analysis for me. I don't know what I was thinking! Hey, I'll go ask Law, he'll know!!!dhk79 said:Jeff,
I just don't get it...
Your clear, concise summation is just too unambiguous and straightforward. Maybe a few out of context half-quotes and some deep analysis of what you were really thinking of when you wrote it will help.
What do you say?
Doug