We have a general VR tips & tricks post coming soon, but I wanted to get in here and respond to a few things.
Re: framerate in VR, virtual reality adds a lot of overhead. That's why the system requirements are so much higher. If you're not getting 90 fps (simply turn on the NavGuides gadget inside RealFlight to check), you should adjust the general graphics quality settings until you do. The VR Quality setting should only be used as a last resort for graphics cards at the very low end of the VR requirements range that can't hit 90 even after lowering the standard graphics quality settings.
rcnoober, I believe you're already talking to Jeremy over on RCGroups, but this deserves a response here, too. What you're describing definitely does not match our expectations. We see ghosting at 45 fps, which is a expected at that speed (this is not unique to RealFlight). But we have not seen the yellow effect you describe, and we do not see ghosting at 90 fps, where you said that occurs. Can you please provide a screenshot or two of what you're seeing?
Re: resolution, VR is not about a high resolution presentation. The hardware isn't there yet. Instead, it's about the experience. Even if the aircraft doesn't look quite as good as it does on your monitor, it's far more immersive to look around the world freely, tracking your model just like you would at the field. It lets you do things like glance between your model and the runway when lining up for a landing. If you get away from yourself and lose orientation, no longer can you rely on the movement of the camera as a clue; you really need to fly your way out of it. A simulation should feel as close to the real thing as possible. VR adds some new levels of realism that have nothing to do with adding pixels.
