Agreed, I was impressed with the beginning of that vid. The plane must be, AT LEAST 1/4 of a mile away, but, I`m guessing closer to a half mile, could be even a mile..??, BUT, when you look at the cockpit windshields, and think that there`s a man`s head behind them, it really gives you a good perspective of just how large it is. And, my god, look at how many wheels it has.
all in all, a masterpiece of engineering, no matter who`s side your on. 
Agreed, I was impressed with the beginning of that vid. The plane must be, AT LEAST 1/4 of a mile away, but, I`m guessing closer to a half mile, could be even a mile..??, BUT, when you look at the cockpit windshields, and think that there`s a man`s head behind them, it really gives you a good perspective of just how large it is. And, my god, look at how many wheels it has.
Nice reference pic. 12-O NOW, who would do such a dastardly thing as to post a false picture of there catch of the day (pic.#1) Gotta be real, what with all the pollution C`MON MAN (pic.#2) Now, I don`t know what looks bigger, BUT, it sure ain`t the fish, even if he is out front, thus disproving your notion
If we go into the special variants of the 747, The 747 Dreamlifter of which there are 4 of in service has a volume capacity of 65,000 cubic feet inside its fusalage while the AN-225 has just 46,000 cubic feet of usable space. That Buran shuttle was also lighter than the Space Shuttle that the 747 used to carry (62 tons for the Buran 68 tons for the Space Shuttle). Another not so well known fact is that the Columbia was the heaviest of all of the space Shuttles by about 8,000 lbs.
. So here are a few screenshots of the landing gears moving over bumps, takeoff, and knelling. I have an idea on the nose door movement and the interior so it may still happen.
I would guess, that they steer...? The C-5 can hit a switch (I guess) that enables all the landing gear to stay parallel to the runway (via rudder input, I think), while the plane is at an angel to the runway, (due to a cross wind approach), SO, no need to kick the rudder hard to align the plane with the runway, right before touchdown, the plane essentially lands sideways with the wheels straight to the runway. Not sure how far they can take that yaw approach angel though, I would guess 20-25 degrees max.?? While on the ground the plane can "crab" sideways (about 25-30 degrees to the runway ?) with that setup, I saw it at an airshow once, was pretty darn cool.
I would guess, that they steer...? The C-5 can hit a switch (I guess) that enables all the landing gear to stay parallel to the runway (via rudder input, I think), while the plane is at an angel to the runway, (due to a cross wind approach), SO, no need to kick the rudder hard to align the plane with the runway, right before touchdown, the plane essentially lands sideways with the wheels straight to the runway. Not sure how far they can take that yaw approach angel though, I would guess 20-25 degrees max.?? While on the ground the plane can "crab" sideways (about 25-30 degrees to the runway ?) with that setup, I saw it at an airshow once, was pretty darn cool.
No doubt, it would be extremely hard to set up in RF, regular functioning gear will wok just fine for the purpose in RF.
